Public use datasets from following PFDN studies are available through the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Data and Specimen Hub (DASH) https://dash.nichd.nih.gov/:
- Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss (Optimal)
- A Randomized Trial of Colpopexy and Urinary Reduction Efforts (CARE Trial)
- Outcomes Following Vaginal Prolapse Repair and Mid Urethral Sling Trial (OPUS)
- Pelvic Symptoms and Patient Satisfaction After Colpocleisis (Colpocleisis Trial)
- Effects of Surgical Treatment Enhanced with Exercise for Mixed Urinary Incontinence (ESTEEM Trial)
- Extended Operations and Pelvic Muscle Training in the Management of Apical Support Loss (E-OPTIMAL)
- Controlling Anal Incontinence by Performing Anal Exercises with Biofeedback or Loperamide: a Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial (CAPABLe)
- Refractory Overactive Bladder: Sacral Neuromodulation v. Botulinum Toxin Assessment (ROSETTA)
- Human Microbiome Study-ESTEEM (HMS-ESTEEM)
- A Randomized Trial of Vaginal Surgery for Uterovaginal Prolapse: Vaginal Hysterectomy with Native Tissue Vault Suspension vs. Mesh Hysteropexy Suspension (SUPeR)
- Efficacy and impact of Botulinum Toxin A versus Anticholinergic Therapy for the Treatment of Bothersome Urge Urinary Incontinence (ABC Trial)
- Neuromodulation for Accidental Bowel Leakage (NOTABLe)
For data on the CAPS study, please click here.
For data on the CAPS Imaging study, please click here.
The following public use datasets are available through NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA):
- HMS-ESTEEM microbial diversity in urine and vagina (Click Here)
The following disclaimer should be added to all abstracts and manuscripts using the PFDN public use datasets:
"Data in this report were collected by the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. This study was supported by grant funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health. The content of this report is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Network investigators or the NIH."